After a few years of brilliance, intellectual iconoclast Christopher Hitchens is at a loss for words. He announced his own death in the Sept. 2010 issue of Vanity Fair and boy was it ... boring.
Some will say he got lucky. The cancer got him before the booze really showed itself. But the booze already had its way with Christopher Hitchens, former voice of the Left who trumped P.J. O'Rourke's hard right in the 80s, with his own abrupt reactionary shift during the Clinton era.
Well. Bill Clinton lost more sleep over pussy than he ever did fretting about the thoughts of a party ingrate.And what did O'Rourke and Co. give us with their economic conservatism and their whacked libertarian ideals: George Bush I&II.
Hitchens'seses move ought to have steeled the wits of his new found foes back then, but he knew his enemy had no teeth: The Lefties, The Liberals, The Progressives. He chewed them up as they ate Brie, cabaled, fucked each others wives, complained about traitors and demonized him. Almost the same way so many Lefties made fun of Dubya and his stupid talk. Turns out Hitchens may have been their only wit. Pity. He's not the lion that roared across anybody's stage, really. Animals, when they are dying, shut up and hide in the bush or under a porch.
Hitchens is doing for cancer what he did to politics for the Lefties: Turned Mencken's greatest show on earth into into a chain reaction yawn-fest by deflating his dreadful march to the scaffold, and stamping his disease as boring and the author himself as bored with its "predictability."
Apparently, his father died of the same type of cancer, so it's no surprise to him, to us, to anybody. And to be a top notch thinker, you have to surprise your audience. Or go bust. Ho-hum. Seems Hitchens has gotten too used to talking to like minds and too used to being smarter than anybody else, tete-a-tete. That may still be true. We surely don't want him staring us down and fuming (if he still fumes and you can't light a match around him) and tearing our little thought-cathedrals to pieces.
He is still funny: He informs us that he's lost a startling 14 pounds since starting chemo. Ha!
He won't be making any appearances on The World's Biggest Loser with those numbers any time soon. But by crikey, there are readers of Vanity Fair who will pay beau coup bucks for his poison. Skinny is still very chic.
Wait. Why are we writing about this dying man?
Because in a sense, he died a while ago. Dead with his drink at talk shows, dead on that enormously self-indulgent video, The Four Horsemen, he, Richard Dawkins, and a couple of other flyblown anti-Christs sitting around a table agreeing with each other about how awful the religionists are, how illogical, why can't they play fair, all without adding an arse-hair's width of news to the conversation. One imagines more could be learned about atheism from an 18th century charnel house intern.
Okay. Why pick on Hitchens now that he's dead. After all, doesn't he save the September 2010 fashion issue of Vanity Fair by being a spooky thing in the middle of all that high-falutin, mind-blowing ultra chic hubris? Well, darn it all, maybe we ask too much some times. Ray Carver faced his own death from cancer at 51 and coughed up "A New Path to the Waterfall." There he revealed himself as a terrible poet with only a loving common law wife to see him through the editing process. At least Carver had the good sense to intersperse his conscious journey to inky dark nothingness with works by other actual poets, and he had pretty good taste. A little queer on Chekhov, but that's okay in a dying man.
What do have we from Mr. Hitchens thus far? At 61, a moratorium on ridicule and irony, prose as bland as his new diet and a report about his own puking incidents to spice things up.
It is true, in the sport of vomiting, one often has to report the act for his/herself. We rarely have witnesses to those low moments and when we do, there is a little nip of shame tucked under our memory of it, never to be erased. But, why Hitch? Why? To emphasize how ill he was, to boast (humbly) that he could appear on TV and also sign books the beautiful day in June when he was told the bad news? Who wouldn't vomit -- ingraciously, violently and preferably on their host? Not Hitch, by gum. He puked like a man. Secretly. Accurately. Stiff upper lip and all that.
What is this bit of mega-insider gossip but a scene from the weekend war story of any heavy drinking braggart? Except, it was the cancer, see. The cancer what allows him to toss his chowder under fire and not lose his shit. Or maybe he did and that part was edited out. Puke story: acceptable. Shitting your pants: C'mon. We have our readership to think about.
Okay.
Mostly we're pissed off because the fashions in Vanity Fair, normally recognizable by African field biologists as larval forms of the botfly, and about accessible as an anchorite's vulva, are parading around our very own campuses here in Tiny Town. And a rotting corpse can do nothing to stop this sick fashion procession, so ill, so sad, so much more interesting than any disease currently under study, and here we are speaking of haute couture, the must-have fall fashions, advertised in a journal that fills its void with words by the dead and dying like so much chum in rotten water. The denouement is Lady Gaga (there, she just got a hit), who makes Muhammad Ali's once famed ego seem about the size of a muton. Hitchens is just a sideshow act.
Hitchens says he pitched his tent in the fields of irony and finds no irony in his condition, but my gosh, others have seen to it that irony is not lost on the man. The ultra chic, dying intellectual. My my. Seated in his Washington, D.C. study with columnar stacks of books behind him (is that the chic thing to do, too, just stack your books, fuck shelving them? Or is that just his latest reading, the little brat?).
Did the cancer get to his talent before it breached security in his lymph nodes? Does that explain the humdrum reviews of his new book Hitch-22, not even a very clever title, or is his dulled wit the work of lifelong enemies, cancer being the latest and most lethal to show itself?
Or IS there a G-d and Hitchens has known this all along and played the D-vil's Advocate and fooled us all? Jeepers. What's wrong with a little ice cream and cake and a fairy tale at the end of this acid bath called life anyway, Hitch?
Hitch: Well, you see, it's simply not accurate.
TTT: Because you say so?
Hitch: Exactly. And the facts speak for themselves. By the way, old fellow (he threw this 'old fellow' bit in for effect, but we took the bait for a sec, Yanks always do), if you're going to be a prick, keep your facts straight.
TTT: Have we not done so?
Hitch: You lack gravitas and a decent education. You are all puff and no ...
TTT: Magic Dragon?
Hitch: See, you Tiny Town folks try to get by just with the clowning. There's nothing behind it, not intellectual depth, not scope, not breadth.
TTT: Scope was a very successful bad breadth wash. The ads were cutting ed --
Hitch: You are wasting my time, maggot.
At just that moment, a fly struck the sash, speaking of which.
TTT: Like that?
Hitchens: Like that.
We could go on. But then, we are not bored with our diseases. Goddammit, we used to care about you, Hitch.
– C. Pembroke Handy, on again, off again, zippity zop
Photo credit: Frankie14850